Sponsored Ad
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: The Functions of Poverty

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brukup Shop by Big Market Square
    Posts
    5,221

    Shocking The Functions of Poverty

    This is a popular article form the 1970s; I read this few years ago, thought it was a great piece, and since then I have been sharing it. Keep in mind the author is not arguing that he agrees with poverty but rather he is illustratrating how poverty functions.

    Herbert J. Gans. The Uses of Poverty: The Poor Pay All.

    Social Policy
    July/August 1971: pp. 20-24.

    Some twenty years ago Robert K. Merton applied the notion of functional analysis to explain the continuing though maligned existence of the urban political machine: if it continued to exist,perhaps it fulfilled latent - unintended or unrecognized - positive functions. Clearly it did. Merton pointed out how the political machine provided central authority to get things done when a decentralized local government could not act, humanized the services of the impersonal bureaucracy for fearful citizens, offered concrete help (rather than abstract law or justice) to the poor, and otherwise performed services needed or demanded by many people but considered
    unconventional or even illegal by formal public agencies. Today, poverty is more maligned than the political machine ever was; yet it, too, is a persistent
    social phenomenon. Consequently, there may be some merit in applying functional analysis to poverty, in asking whether it also has positive functions that explain its persistence. Merton defined functions as "those observed consequences [of a phenomenon] which make for the adaptation or adjustment of a given [social] system."

    I shall use a slightly different definition; instead of identifying functions for an entire social system, I shall identify them for the interest groups, socio-economic classes, and other population aggregates with shared values that 'inhabit'
    a social system. I suspect that in a modern heterogeneous society, few phenomena are functional or dysfunctional for the society as a whole, and that most result in benefits to some groups and costs to others. Nor are any phenomena indispensable; in most instances, one can suggest what Merton calls "functional alternatives" or equivalents for them, i.e., other social patterns or policies that achieve the same positive functions but avoid the dysfunctions. Associating poverty with positive functions seems at first glance to be unimaginable. Of course, the slumlord and the loan shark are commonly known to profit from the existence of poverty, but they
    are viewed as evil men, so their activities are classified among the dysfunctions of poverty. However, what is less often recognized, at least by the conventional wisdom, is that poverty also makes possible the existence or expansion of respectable professions and occupations, for example, penology, criminology, social work, and public health. More recently, the poor have provided jobs for professional and para-professional "poverty warriors," and for journalists and social scientists, this author included, who have supplied the information demanded by the revival of public interest in poverty. Clearly, then, poverty and the poor may well satisfy a number of positive functions for many nonpoor groups in American society. I shall describe thirteen such functions - economic, social and political - that seem to me most significant.

    The Functions of Poverty

    First, the existence of poverty ensures that society's "dirty work" will be done. Every society has such work: physically dirty or dangerous, temporary, dead-end and underpaid, undignified and menial jobs. Society can fill these jobs by paying higher wages than for "clean" work, or it can force people who have no other choice to do the dirty work - and at low wages. In America, poverty functions to provide a low-wage labor pool that is willing - or rather, unable to be unwilling - to perform dirty work at low cost. Indeed, this function of the poor is so important that in some Southern states, welfare payments have been cut off during the summer months when the poor
    are needed to work in the fields. Moreover, much of the debate about the Negative Income Tax and the Family Assistance Plan [welfare programs] has concerned their impact on the work incentive, by which is actually meant the incentive of the poor to do the needed dirty work if the wages therefrom are no larger than the income grant. Many economic activities that involve dirty work depend on the poor for their existence: restaurants, hospitals, parts of the garment industry, and "truck farming," among others, could not persist in their present form without the poor.

    Second, because the poor are required to work at low wages, they subsidize a variety of economic activities that benefit the affluent. For example, domestics subsidize the upper middle and upper classes, making life easier for their employers and freeing affluent women for a variety of professional, cultural, civic and partying activities. Similarly, because the poor pay a higher proportion of their income in property and sales taxes, among others, they subsidize many state and local governmental services that benefit more affluent groups. In addition, the poor support innovation in medical practice as patients in teaching and research hospitals and as guinea pigs in medical experiments.

    Third, poverty creates jobs for a number of occupations and professions that serve or "service" the poor, or protect the rest of society from them. As already noted, penology would be minuscule without the poor, as would the police. Other activities and groups that flourish because of the existence of poverty are the numbers game, the sale of heroin and cheap wines and liquors, Pentecostal ministers, faith healers, prostitutes, pawn shops, and the peacetime army, which recruits its enlisted men mainly from among the poor.

    Fourth, the poor buy goods others do not want and thus prolong the economic usefulness of such goods - day-old bread, fruit and vegetables that otherwise would have to be thrown out, secondhand clothes, and deteriorating automobiles and buildings. They also provide incomes for doctors, lawyers, teachers, and others who are too old, poorly trained or incompetent to attract more affluent clients. In addition to economic functions, the poor perform a number of social functions:

    Fifth, the poor can be identified and punished as alleged or real deviants in order to uphold the legitimacy of conventional norms. To justify the desirability of hard work, thrift, honesty, and monogamy, for example, the defenders of these norms must be able to find people who can be accused of being lazy, spendthrift, dishonest, and promiscuous. Although there is some evidence that the poor are about as moral and law-abiding as anyone else, they are more likely than middleclass transgressors to be caught and punished when they participate in deviant acts. Moreover, they lack the political and cultural power to correct the stereotypes that other people hold of them and thus continue to be thought of as lazy, spendthrift, etc., by those who need living proof that moral deviance does not pay.

    Sixth, and conversely, the poor offer vicarious participation to the rest of the population in the uninhibited sexual, alcoholic, and narcotic behavior in which they are alleged to participate and which, being freed from the constraints of affluence, they are often thought to enjoy more than the middle classes. Thus many people, some social scientists included, believe that the poor not only are more given to uninhibited behavior (which may be true, although it is often motivated by despair more than by lack of inhibition) but derive more pleasure from it than affluent people (which
    research by Lee Rainwater, Walter Miller and others shows to be patently untrue). However, whether the poor actually have more sex and enjoy it more is irrelevant; so long as middle-class people believe this to be true, they can participate in it vicariously when instances are reported in factual or fictional form.

    Seventh, the poor also serve a direct cultural function when culture created by or for them is adopted by the more affluent. The rich often collect artifacts from extinct folk cultures of poor people; and almost all Americans listen to the blues, Negro spirituals, and country music, which originated among the Southern poor. Recently they have enjoyed the rock styles that were born, like the Beatles, in the slums, and in the last year, poetry written by ghetto children has become popular in literary circles. The poor also serve as culture heroes, particularly, of course, to the Left;
    but the hobo, the cowboy, the hipster, and the mythical prostitute with a heart of gold have performed this function for a variety of groups.

    Eighth, poverty helps to guarantee the status of those who are not poor. In every hierarchicalsociety, someone has to be at the bottom; but in American society, in which social mobility is an important goal for many and people need to know where they stand, the poor function as a reliable and relatively permanent measuring rod for status comparisons. This is particularly tru e for the working class, whose politics is influenced by the need to maintain status distinctions between themselves and the poor, much as the aristocracy must find ways of distinguishing itself from the
    nouveaux riches.

    Ninth, the poor also aid the upward mobility of groups just above them in the class hierarchy. Thus a goodly number of Americans have entered the middle class through the profits earned from the provision of goods and services in the slums, including illegal or nonrespectable ones that upperclass and upper-middle-class businessmen shun because of their low prestige. As a result, members of almost every immigrant group have financed their upward mobility by providing slum housing, entertainment, gambling, narcotics, etc., to later arrivals - most recently to Blacks and Puerto Ricans.

    Tenth, the poor help to keep the aristocracy busy, thus justifying its continued existence. "Society" uses the poor as clients of settlement houses and beneficiaries of charity affairs; indeed, the aristocracy must have the poor to demonstrate its superiority over other elites who devote themselves to earning money.

    Eleventh, the poor, being powerless, can be made to absorb the costs of change and growth in American society. During the nineteenth century, they did the backbreaking work that built the cities; today, they are pushed out of their neighborhoods to make room for "progress. Urban renewal projects to hold middle-class taxpayers in the city and expressways to enable suburbanites to commute downtown have typically been located in poor neighborhoods, since no other group will allow itself to be displaced. For the same reason, universities, hospitals, and civic centers also expand into land occupied by the poor. The major costs of the industrialization of agriculture have been borne by the poor, who are pushed off the land without recompense; and they have paid a large share of the human cost of the growth of American power overseas, for they have provided many of the foot soldiers for Vietnam and other wars.

    Twelfth, the poor facilitate and stabilize the American political process. Because they vote and participate in politics less than other groups, the political system is often free to ignore them. Moreover, since they can rarely support Republicans, they often provide the Democrats with a captive constituency that has no other place to go. As a result, the Democrats can count on their votes, and be more responsive to voters - for example, the white working class - who might otherwise switch to the Republicans.
    Thirteenth, the role of the poor in upholding conventional norms (see the fifth point, above) also has a significant political function. An economy based on the ideology of laissez faire requires a deprived population that is allegedly unwilling to work or that can be considered inferior because it must accept charity or welfare in order to survive. Not only does the alleged moral deviancy of the poor reduce the moral pressure on the present political economy to eliminate poverty but socialist
    alternatives can be made to look quite unattractive if those who will benefit most from them can be described as lazy, spendthrift, dishonest and promiscuous.

    The Alternatives

    I have described thirteen of the more important functions poverty and the poor satisfy in American society, enough to support the functionalist thesis that poverty, like any other social phenomenon, survives in part because it is useful to society or some of its parts. This analysis is not intended to suggest that because it is often functional, poverty
    should exist, or that it must exist. For one thing, poverty has many more dysfunctions that functions; for another, it is possible to suggest functional
    alternatives. For example, society's dirty work could be done without poverty, either by automation or by paying "dirty workers" decent wages. Nor is it necessary for the poor to subsidize the many activities they support through their low-wage jobs. This would, however, drive up the costs of these activities, which would result in higher prices to their customers and clients. Similarly, many of the professionals who flourish because of the poor could be given other roles.

    Social workers could provide counseling to the affluent, as they prefer to do anyway; and the police could devote themselves to traffic and organized crime. Other roles would have to be found for badly trained or incompetent professionals now relegated to serving the poor, and someone else would have to pay their salaries. Fewer penologists would be employable, however. And Pentecostal religion probably
    could not survive without the poor - nor would parts of the second- and third-hand goods market. And in many cities, "used" housing that no one else wants would then have to be torn down at public expense. Alternatives for the cultural functions of the poor could be found more easily and cheaply. Indeed, entertainers, hippies, and adolescents are already serving as the deviants needed to uphold traditional morality and as devotees of orgies to "staff" the fantasies of vicarious participation. The status functions of the poor are another matter. In a hierarchical society, some people must be defined as inferior to everyone else with respect to a variety of attributes, but they need not be poor in the absolute sense. One could conceive of a society in which the "lower class," though last in the pecking order, received 75 percent of the median income, rather than 15-40 percent, as is now the case. Needless to say, this would require considerable income redistribution.

    The contribution the poor make to the upward mobility of the groups that provide them with goods and services could also be maintained without the poor's having such low incomes. However, it is true that if the poor were more affluent, they would have access to enough capital to take over the provider role, thus competing with and perhaps rejecting the "outsiders." (Indeed, owing in part to antipoverty programs, this is already happening in a number of ghettos, where white storeowners are being replaced by Blacks.) Similarly, if the poor were more affluent, they would make less
    willing clients for upper-class philanthropy, although some would still use settlement houses to achieve upward mobility, as they do now. Thus "Society" could continue to run its philanthropic activities. The political functions of the poor would be more difficult to replace. With increased affluence the poor would probably obtain more political power and be more active politically. With higher incomes and more political power, the poor would be likely to resist paying the costs of growth and change. Of course, it is possible to imagine urban renewal and highway projects that properly
    reimbursed the displaced people, but such projects would then become considerably more expensive, and many might never be built. This, in turn, would reduce the comfort and convenience of those who now benefit from urban renewal and expressways. Finally, hippies could serve also as more deviants to justify the existing political economy - as they already do.

    Presumably, however, if poverty were eliminated, there would be fewer attacks on that economy. In sum, then, many of the functions served by the poor could be replaced if poverty were eliminated, but almost always at higher costs to others, particularly more affluent others. Consequently, a functional analysis must conclude that poverty persists not only because it fulfills a number of positive functions but also because many of the functional alternatives to poverty would be quite dysfunctional for the affluent members of society. A functional analysis thus ultimately arrives at much the same conclusion as radical sociology, except that radical thinkers treat as manifest what I describe as latent: that social phenomena that are functional for affluent or powerful groups and dysfunctional for poor or powerless ones persist; that when the elimination of such phenomena through functional alternatives would generate dysfunctions for the affluent or powerful, they will continue to persist; and that phenomena like poverty can be eliminated only when they become dysfunctional for the affluent or powerful, or when the powerless can obtainenough power to change society.
    One Love,
    Ade


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Between Tranquility and Silence.
    Age
    93
    Posts
    17,678

    Default


    big ups

    you know when you have an "picture" in your mind, but you just can't explain or paint it for others?

    lol this man just broke it down for me

    i'ma help you spread this article.

    ""

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    bronx
    Posts
    11,341

    Default

    no read yet but print it still
    the boy AIDS always have
    nice thought provoking articles

    concernng poverty though
    the millions of pumkin wastes each year
    for a stupid satan holiday
    know how much people that pukin coulda feed

    just my thought still

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    PON DI KORNER A BEAT A ONE SMOOTHIE WID MI THUGS DEM.
    Posts
    7,628

    Default

    NICE DROP. BLESS.

    ALLIANCE MI SEH...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Age
    31
    Posts
    4,784

    Thumbs up

    A neat critique of democratic-market societies.

    The Immaculate Evolution

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Popes Head street
    Age
    37
    Posts
    20,533

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brukup Shop by Big Market Square
    Posts
    5,221

    Default

    The Functions of Poverty

    First, the existence of poverty ensures that society's "dirty work" will be done.
    Think about all the fast food chanis that have a 100% yearly worker turn over.
    Second, because the poor are required to work at low wages, they subsidize a variety of economic activities that benefit the affluent.
    Day workers...fruit pickers...immigrant baby sitters. Thoe poor is also required to take loans at higher amounts...check this NY times article
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/04/we...w/04bajaj.html


    Third, poverty creates jobs for a number of occupations and professions that serve or "service" the poor, or protect the rest of society from them.
    Parole officers...social workers.

    Fourth, the poor buy goods others do not want and thus prolong the economic usefulness of such goods - day-old bread, fruit and vegetables that otherwise would have to be thrown out, secondhand clothes, and deteriorating automobiles and buildings.
    Try going to an affulent neighborhood's suprmarket, I have done this experiment myself. Those supermarkets are ten times better than the supermarkets int he hood. I have seen blue chicken on the self in poor neighborhoods; would never happen in upperclass neighborhoods.

    Fifth, the poor can be identified and punished as alleged or real deviants in order to uphold the legitimacy of conventional norms.
    ..which lead to the prison indistrial complex.

    Sixth, and conversely, the poor offer vicarious participation to the rest of the population in the uninhibited sexual, alcoholic, and narcotic behavior in which they are alleged to participate
    Hence Dr. Cosby can spew his verbal diarreaha at poor people and he himslef lacks morals.

    Seventh, the poor also serve a direct cultural function when culture created by or for them is adopted by the more affluent.
    Jazz...Hip Hop...Reggae...Steel pan...Blues

    Eighth, poverty helps to guarantee the status of those who are not poor.
    Like Stephen Colbert says the Bush Administration and conservatives alike says that poor people should "pull themselves up by their boot straps," to which he responds I seen it done once but only in soliel. "Look at me I 'made it,' you can do it too," not far from the truth.

    Ninth, the poor also aid the upward mobility of groups just above them in the class hierarchy. Thus a goodly number of Americans have entered the middle class through the profits earned from the provision of goods and services in the slums,
    Slum lords...think about the people that own the supermarkets in the poor neighborhoods, none of them live there...even the bodega owners aremoving out.


    Tenth, the poor help to keep the aristocracy busy, thus justifying its continued existence. "Society" uses the poor as clients of settlement houses and beneficiaries of charity affairs;
    Every rich person all of a sudden want to donate to their favorite charity and now does charity work...lol

    Eleventh, the poor, being powerless, can be made to absorb the costs of change and growth in American society.
    When NYU wanted to expand, guess who lost their homes? Guess who is going to loose theri homes in Fort Green NY to make rooms for the rich moving in. Blacks own less than 5% of harlem businesses.


    Twelfth, the poor facilitate and stabilize the American political process. Because they vote and participate in politics less than other groups, the political system is often free to ignore them.

    Thirteenth, the role of the poor in upholding conventional norms (see the fifth point, above) also has a significant political function


    One Love,
    Ade

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    12,791

    Default

    *Shame* @ Fourth, the poor buy goods others do not want and thus prolong the economic usefulness of such goods - day-old bread, fruit and vegetables that otherwise would have to be thrown out,

    Describing my mother to a tee...

    HURRAH FOR DIAMONDS

  9. #9
    cooli23 is offline Member needs to UPDATE email info or CONFIRM email address
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    deya
    Age
    27
    Posts
    6,274

    Default

    Nice thread

  10. #10
    cooli23 is offline Member needs to UPDATE email info or CONFIRM email address
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    deya
    Age
    27
    Posts
    6,274

    Default

    Just like crime.Correctional facilities employs individuals.Police will maintain their jobs.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    6,959

    Default

    just finished reading a 20 page article in my anthro class, so i cannot read this right now. ill be back later when my eyes feel better


  12. #12
    cooli23 is offline Member needs to UPDATE email info or CONFIRM email address
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    deya
    Age
    27
    Posts
    6,274

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Junior Kalonji View Post
    A neat critique of democratic-market societies.

    Exactly.

    The Democrat party benefits from the poor.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    On the Highway
    Posts
    2,927

    Default

    The way it's presented reads more like the ""benefits of poverty" than " the functions of poverty"......validating the rich getter richer and the poor more poor.


    @Cooli u've never met context have u?
    With the same sword they knight u,
    they gon' good night u with
    Shit, that's only half if they like u
    That ain't even half what they might do

  14. #14
    cooli23 is offline Member needs to UPDATE email info or CONFIRM email address
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    deya
    Age
    27
    Posts
    6,274

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unequivocal View Post
    The way it's presented reads more like the ""benefits of poverty" than " the functions of poverty"......validating the rich getter richer and the poor more poor.


    @Cooli u've never met context have u?
    ??????????

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    On the Highway
    Posts
    2,927

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cooli23 View Post
    ??????????
    saw that coming.....read slower, if u dont get it the first time, read again............Bonita D done told ya.
    With the same sword they knight u,
    they gon' good night u with
    Shit, that's only half if they like u
    That ain't even half what they might do

  16. #16
    cooli23 is offline Member needs to UPDATE email info or CONFIRM email address
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    deya
    Age
    27
    Posts
    6,274

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unequivocal View Post
    saw that coming.....read slower, if u dont get it the first time, read again............Bonita D done told ya.

    I read the article.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    --------------
    Posts
    5,795

    Default

    Interesting thread.
    http://pegasus.dancehallreggae.com/forum/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=90&dateline=122122052  1

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brukup Shop by Big Market Square
    Posts
    5,221

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reddz View Post
    just finished reading a 20 page article in my anthro class, so i cannot read this right now. ill be back later when my eyes feel better

    hehe.

    Just wait till you get to grad school, if you get into the social sciences, some weeks you will have to read about four 40-50 page articles plus a chapter or two from a book, don't worry though, it becomes easy after a while.

    One Love,
    Ade

Similar Threads

  1. Official Pan-Afrikan thread!-No Honkies
    By TriniBandele in forum The PASSA PASSA Forum
    Replies: 215
    Last Post: 10-28-2009, 11:21 PM
  2. Is poverty an excuse
    By real_rudebwoy in forum The PASSA PASSA Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-20-2007, 04:45 PM
  3. money, misogyny, machismo and mama man
    By MochaChocolatte in forum *Grown Folks Lounge*
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-02-2007, 01:42 PM
  4. poverty and speech
    By MochaChocolatte in forum The PASSA PASSA Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-13-2007, 04:50 PM
  5. Black Poverty: Capitalism -v- Voodoo
    By JA-Rock in forum *Grown Folks Lounge*
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 03-20-2006, 11:36 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •